Paper #1 – DeResolver: A Decentralized Negotiation and Conflict Resolution Framework for Smart City Services

19 May 2021
1:30 - 1:45 AEST
10:30 am - 10:45 am CDT
17:30 - 17:45 CEST
15:30 - 15:45 UTC
Online

Paper #1 – DeResolver: A Decentralized Negotiation and Conflict Resolution Framework for Smart City Services

BEST PAPER AWARD

DeResolver: a decentralized negotiation and conflict resolution framework for smart city services

  • Yukun Yuan
  • Meiyi Ma
  • Songyang Han
  • Desheng Zhang
  • Fei Miao
  • John Stankovic
  • Shan Lin

As various smart services are increasingly deployed in modern cities, many unexpected conflicts arise due to various physical world couplings. Existing solutions for conflict resolution often rely on centralized control to enforce predetermined and fixed priorities of different services, which is challenging due to the inconsistent and private objectives of the services. Also, the centralized solutions miss opportunities to more effectively resolve conflicts according to their spatiotemporal locality of the conflicts. To address this issue, we design a decentralized negotiation and conflict resolution framework named DeResolver, which allows services to resolve conflicts by communicating and negotiating with each other to reach a Pareto-optimal agreement autonomously and efficiently. Our design features a two-level semi-supervised learning-based algorithm to predict acceptable proposals and their rankings of each opponent through the negotiation. Our design is evaluated with a smart city case study of three services: intelligent traffic light control, pedestrian service, and environmental control. In this case study, a data-driven evaluation is conducted using a large data set consisting of the GPS locations of 246 surveillance cameras and an automatic traffic monitoring system with more than 3 million records per day to extract real-world vehicle routes. The evaluation results show that our solution achieves much more balanced results, i.e., only increasing the average waiting time of vehicles, the measurement metric of intelligent traffic light control service, by 6.8% while reducing the weighted sum of air pollutant emission, measured for environment control service, by 12.1%, and the pedestrian waiting time, the measurement metric of pedestrian service, by 33.1%, compared to priority-based solution.